NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 134 Watt
- 300x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15796 vs 9529
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 vs 26 March 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 134 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 vs 9529 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 941 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 30.11 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3378 vs 771
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 464 vs 236
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 941 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec vs 30.11 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops vs 722.7 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3378 vs 771 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 464 vs 236 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 771 | 3378 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | 464 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 | 9529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 825M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GK208 | GK106 |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 | 26 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 813 | 814 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 1,585 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s | 62.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 134 Watt |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |