NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and NVIDIA GeForce 825M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 941 MHz
• Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 99% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2580 vs 771

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M

• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 236 vs 217
• Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15796 vs 9741

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 825M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2580 771
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	217 236
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9741 15796

Compare specifications (specs)