NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 837 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 941 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 7.6x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 300x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Launch date | 27 January 2014 vs 19 February 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 837 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 941 MHz vs 876 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- 6.2x more texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 30.11 GTexel / s
- 7x more pipelines: 2688 vs 384
- 6.5x better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 10.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8194 vs 771
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 649 vs 236
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24530 vs 15796
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec vs 30.11 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops vs 722.7 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8194 vs 771 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 vs 236 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24530 vs 15796 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 771 | 8194 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | 649 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 | 24530 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 825M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GK208 | GK110 |
| Launch date | 27 January 2014 | 19 February 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 843 | 422 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $2,054.59 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 4,709 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2688 |
| Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s | 187.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1300 Million | 7,080 million |
| CUDA cores | 2688 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
