NVIDIA GeForce 830M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 830M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 830M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 18.4 GTexel / s versus 16.1 billion / sec
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 256 versus 192
- Environ 14% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 588.8 gflops versus 518.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 52% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
- Environ 44% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4179 versus 4119
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.955 versus 11.121
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.443 versus 32.965
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1729 versus 1699
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 versus 2837
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1729 versus 1699
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 versus 2837
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 3 September 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.4 GTexel / s versus 16.1 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 256 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 588.8 gflops versus 518.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4179 versus 4119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.955 versus 11.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.443 versus 32.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1729 versus 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 versus 2837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1729 versus 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 versus 2837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3349 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 1082 MHz
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1213 versus 1010
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 versus 136
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 391.548 versus 156.544
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.105 versus 1.013
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.548 versus 17.81
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 1082 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1213 versus 1010 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 versus 136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 391.548 versus 156.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.105 versus 1.013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.548 versus 17.81 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 830M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 830M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1010 | 1213 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 136 | 255 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4179 | 4119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.955 | 11.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 156.544 | 391.548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.013 | 1.105 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.81 | 18.548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.443 | 32.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1729 | 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 | 2837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1729 | 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 | 2837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 830M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GM108 | GF106 |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 3 September 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1229 | 1231 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1082 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 588.8 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.4 GTexel / s | 16.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 60.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 830M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5750
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM
