NVIDIA GeForce 840M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840M and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 667 MHz
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 768.4 gflops
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5771 vs 4566
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.848 vs 12.383
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.237 vs 1.107
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 vs 40.703

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

• Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 32.02 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 3008 MHz vs 2002 MHz
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1363 vs 1096
• Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 151
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.892 vs 162.594
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.761 vs 21.15
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 vs 2085
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 vs 2736
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 3191
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 vs 2085
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 vs 2736
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 3191

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1096 1363
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	151 287
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5771 4566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.848 12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.594 358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.237 1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.15 21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	95.545 40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2085 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2736 3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3191 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2085 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2736 3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3191 3362

Compare specifications (specs)