NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX and ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 24x more pipelines: 96 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 32 MB
- Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 460 MHz
- 154x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 462 vs 3
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 175 vs 145
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 November 2007 vs 1 March 2003 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 4 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 150 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 32 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 460 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 462 vs 3 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 vs 145 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon 9200
- 33.3x more texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
| Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 462 | 3 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 | 145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2485 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2485 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Rage 7 |
| Code name | G92 | M9+ |
| Launch date | 1 November 2007 | 1 March 2003 |
| Place in performance rating | 1160 | 1163 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 200 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 4 |
| Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | 800 MTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 36 million |
| Boost clock speed | 250 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-HE | AGP 8x |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 32 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 14.72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 200 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 460 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | 128 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
