NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 6.9x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
- 8.3x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 36 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 719 vs 90
- 10.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 328
- 10.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 328
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 14 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops vs 36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 719 vs 90 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 328 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 118
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 118 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 719 | 90 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 118 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3709 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 920M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GK208B | M72 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 14 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1309 | 1306 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
PowerPlay 7.0 |