NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA Quadro K610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce 920M

NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 717 vs 700
Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3725 vs 1996
Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.443 vs 20.881
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 1123
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 2253
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3195
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 1123
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 2253
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3195

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 March 2015 vs 23 July 2013
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	717 vs 700
Geekbench - OpenCL	3725 vs 1996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	40.443 vs 20.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1598 vs 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3636 vs 2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3195
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1598 vs 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3636 vs 2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3195

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Around 3% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 954 MHz
Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 15.68 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
Around 26% better floating-point performance: 376.3 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 33 Watt
Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 119
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 182.093 vs 157.606

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	980 MHz vs 954 MHz
Texture fill rate	15.68 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	376.3 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 33 Watt
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	218 vs 119
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	182.093 vs 157.606

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K610M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

717

700

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

119

218

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3725

1996

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

157.606

182.093

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.443

20.881

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1598

1123

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3636

2253

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3195

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1598

1123

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3636

2253

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3195

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 920M	NVIDIA Quadro K610M
PassMark - G3D Mark	717	700
PassMark - G2D Mark	119	218
Geekbench - OpenCL	3725	1996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	157.606	182.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.843	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	40.443	20.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1598	1123
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3636	2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3195
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1598	1123
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3636	2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3195
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	326

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 920M	NVIDIA Quadro K610M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Kepler 2.0
Code name	GK208B	GK208
Launch date	13 March 2015	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	1300	1301
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$229.99
Price now		$75
Value for money (0-100)		11.43
Technical info
Core clock speed	954 MHz	980 MHz
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops	376.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	192
Texture fill rate	12.4 GTexel / s	15.68 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	1270 Million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	20.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management