NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs ATI FireGL X1-256
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and ATI FireGL X1-256 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 325 MHz
- 10.9x more texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 2.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 16 Watt vs 37 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 620 MHz
- 18.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1073 vs 59
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 vs 1 July 2002 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 325 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 2.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt vs 37 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1073 vs 59 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL X1-256
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 167 vs 149
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 167 vs 149 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: ATI FireGL X1-256
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | ATI FireGL X1-256 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1073 | 59 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 167 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3951 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | ATI FireGL X1-256 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Rage 8 |
Code name | GM108 | R300 |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 | 1 July 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1027 | 1024 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 325 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 2.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt | 37 Watt |
Transistor count | 110 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 19.84 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 620 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |