NVIDIA GeForce 930MX vs AMD Radeon R9 M275X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and AMD Radeon R9 M275X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 vs 1228
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1705
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 vs 1228
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1705

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X

• Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 24.48 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 51% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 783.4 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1537 vs 1289
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 194
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 5518
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.109 vs 23.565
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 283.116 vs 165.338
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.187 vs 1.09
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 vs 2053
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 vs 2053

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1289 1537
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 307
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5518 11041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.565 28.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.338 283.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.09 2.187
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2053 3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3577 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 1705
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2053 3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3577 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 1705

Compare specifications (specs)