NVIDIA GeForce 930MX vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and NVIDIA Quadro 2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce 930MX

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 52% higher core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 625 MHz
Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 24.48 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
Around 63% better floating-point performance: 783.4 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
3.6x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 62 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1289 vs 976
Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5525 vs 3925
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.565 vs 11.122
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2053 vs 1453
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 vs 3447
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2053 vs 1453
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 vs 3447

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 March 2016 vs 5 October 2011
Core clock speed	952 MHz vs 625 MHz
Texture fill rate	24.48 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Floating-point performance	783.4 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	17 Watt vs 62 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1289 vs 976
Geekbench - OpenCL	5525 vs 3925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.565 vs 11.122
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2053 vs 1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3577 vs 3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2053 vs 1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3577 vs 3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 328 vs 194
Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 320.57 vs 165.338

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	328 vs 194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	320.57 vs 165.338

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1289

976

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

194

328

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5525

3925

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

23.565

11.122

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

165.338

320.57

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2053

1453

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3577

3447

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2053

1453

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3577

3447

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3353

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 930MX	NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
PassMark - G3D Mark	1289	976
PassMark - G2D Mark	194	328
Geekbench - OpenCL	5525	3925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.565	11.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	165.338	320.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.09	0
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2053	1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3577	3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2053	1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3577	3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		12.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		31.168

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 930MX	NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM108	GF106
Launch date	1 March 2016	5 October 2011
Place in performance rating	1124	1127
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$599
Price now		$209
Value for money (0-100)		7.27
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1020 MHz
Core clock speed	952 MHz	625 MHz
Floating-point performance	783.4 gflops	480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	384	192
Texture fill rate	24.48 GTexel / s	20 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	17 Watt	62 Watt
Transistor count		1,170 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		178 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	41.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus