NVIDIA GeForce 945M versus NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 945M and NVIDIA Quadro K620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 66% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 29.81 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 11% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 953.9 gflops versus 863.2 gflops
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8099 versus 6869
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.633 versus 22.112
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 380.461 versus 297.631
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.988 versus 1.427
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.027 versus 15.363
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.094 versus 99.125
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 2490
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 2490
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2015 versus 22 July 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops versus 863.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 versus 6869 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 versus 22.112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 versus 297.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 versus 1.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 versus 15.363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 versus 99.125 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3329 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 1029 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1124 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Environ 83% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2231 versus 2109
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 versus 240
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 1029 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 versus 2109 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 versus 240 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 versus 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 versus 2961 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 | 2231 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 474 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | 6869 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | 22.112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | 297.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | 1.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | 15.363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 | 99.125 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 945M | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 973 | 975 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
| Prix maintenant | $189.93 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 41 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Longeur | 160 mm | |
| Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 945M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
ATIFireGL T2-128
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1100
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGRID K2
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDFirePro W4100
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient
