NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs NVIDIA GeForce 7050 + nForce 620i
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and NVIDIA GeForce 7050 + nForce 620i videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 7.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 330 vs 42
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 October 2008 vs 4 October 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 330 vs 42 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7050 + nForce 620i
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 88 vs 79
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 88 vs 79 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7050 + nForce 620i
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 | NVIDIA GeForce 7050 + nForce 620i |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 330 | 42 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 79 | 88 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2239 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2239 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 | NVIDIA GeForce 7050 + nForce 620i | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G94 | C73 |
Launch date | 23 October 2008 | 4 October 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1439 | 1430 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1625 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 156 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | |
Transistor count | 505 million | 112 million |
Boost clock speed | 630 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Two Dual Link DVIHDTV | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |