NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- Around 99% better floating-point performance: 311.0 gflops vs 156 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 90 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 676 vs 330
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 79
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 23 October 2008 |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 311.0 gflops vs 156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 90 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 676 vs 330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 vs 79 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
- 2x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 billion / sec vs 12.96 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2239 vs 2073
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2239 vs 2073
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 billion / sec vs 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2239 vs 2073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2239 vs 2073 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 676 | 330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 | 79 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2448 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 | 2239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 | 2239 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF108 | G94 |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 23 October 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1436 | 1439 |
| Price now | $99.21 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 311.0 gflops | 156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s | 15.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 90 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Two Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 9" (22.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO 512
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5730
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 435M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
NVIDIANVS 510
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
AMDFirePro S4000X
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID M40
