NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810M and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 90 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 413 vs 330
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3035 vs 2239
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3035 vs 2239

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

• 2.2x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 738 MHz
• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 15.6 billion / sec vs 5.904 GTexel / s
• Around 10% better floating-point performance: 156 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 79 vs 66

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	413 330
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	66 79
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3035 2239
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3035 2239

Compare specifications (specs)