NVIDIA GeForce G102M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G102M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G102M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 33
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 168 vs 140
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 vs 7 January 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 vs 33 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 168 vs 140 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 90 nm
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1586 vs 890
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1586 vs 890
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 90 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1586 vs 890 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1586 vs 890 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G102M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce G102M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 33 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 168 | 140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 890 | 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 890 | 1586 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce G102M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | MCP79MX | M86 |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 7 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1612 | 1613 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Gigaflops | 48 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 378 million |
Floating-point performance | 120 gflops | |
Pipelines | 120 | |
Texture fill rate | 4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | VGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 1.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2 | DDR2 / GDDR3 / GDDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PCI-E 2.0 |