NVIDIA GeForce G102M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G102M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G102M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 32
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 168 vs 142
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 January 2009 vs 7 January 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 vs 32 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 168 vs 142 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 90 nm
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1586 vs 890
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1586 vs 890
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 90 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1586 vs 890 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1586 vs 890 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G102M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce G102M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 32 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 168 | 142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 890 | 1586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 890 | 1586 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce G102M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
| Code name | MCP79MX | M86 |
| Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 7 January 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1617 | 1618 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Gigaflops | 48 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 210 million | 378 million |
| Floating-point performance | 120 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 120 | |
| Texture fill rate | 4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | VGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 1.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR2 | DDR2 / GDDR3 / GDDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
