NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GeForce G102M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 400 and NVIDIA GeForce G102M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 1540 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1103 vs 890
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1103 vs 890
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 April 2011 vs 8 January 2009 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1540 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1103 vs 890 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1103 vs 890 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G102M
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 32 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 168 vs 148
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 32 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 168 vs 148 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G102M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro 400 | NVIDIA GeForce G102M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 | 168 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 59 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4630 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1103 | 890 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1103 | 890 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro 400 | NVIDIA GeForce G102M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GT216 | MCP79MX |
| Launch date | 5 April 2011 | 8 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1614 | 1617 |
| Price now | $145.55 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.13 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 108 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | |
| Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt | 14 Watt |
| Transistor count | 486 million | 210 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Gigaflops | 48 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | VGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 163 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 1.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.32 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1540 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
