NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 69 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Launch date | 17 November 2009 vs 4 March 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
- Around 50% better floating-point performance: 387.1 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 591 vs 501
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 54 vs 46
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3108 vs 1979
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3108 vs 1979
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1385
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1385
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 591 vs 501 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 54 vs 46 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3108 vs 1979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3108 vs 1979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1385 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1385 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 501 | 591 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 | 54 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9236 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1979 | 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1979 | 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1385 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1385 | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT215 | G92B |
Launch date | 17 November 2009 | 4 March 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 1394 | 1021 |
Price now | $37.99 | $114.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.27 | 9.91 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1340 MHz | 1836 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | 128 |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops | 387.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105C C | 105 °C |
Pipelines | 96 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 47.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S / PDIF |
Display Connectors | DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, Two Dual Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm) | 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB or 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |