NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 82 vs 46
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 vs 14 August 2008 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 82 vs 46 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 43.2 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
- Around 64% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 586 vs 395
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3272 vs 2505
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3272 vs 2505
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 586 vs 395 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3272 vs 2505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3272 vs 2505 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 82 | 46 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 395 | 586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2505 | 3272 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2505 | 3272 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G92 |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 | 14 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1406 | 1408 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops | 422.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 43.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 175 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.0 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |