NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 82 vs 46
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 February 2010 vs 14 August 2008
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 82 vs 46

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

  • Around 35% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • 2.5x more texture fill rate: 43.2 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
  • Around 64% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 586 vs 395
  • Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3272 vs 2505
  • Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3272 vs 2505
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 675 MHz vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate 43.2 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 128 vs 96
Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 586 vs 395
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3272 vs 2505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3272 vs 2505

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
82
46
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
395
586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2505
3272
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2505
3272
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
PassMark - G2D Mark 82 46
PassMark - G3D Mark 395 586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2505 3272
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2505 3272

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Essentials

Architecture Tesla Tesla
Code name G92 G92
Launch date 2 February 2010 14 August 2008
Place in performance rating 1405 1407
Type Desktop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 500 MHz 675 MHz
Floating-point performance 257.28 gflops 422.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 96 128
Texture fill rate 17.6 GTexel / s 43.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 754 million 754 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 175 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 3.3 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 32.0 GB / s 64.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
PowerMizer 8.0