NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 538 vs 395
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 150 vs 82
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2505
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2505
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 2 February 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 538 vs 395 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 vs 82 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 2505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 2505 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 257.28 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 538 | 395 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 82 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2398 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 2505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 2505 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF108 | G92 |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 2 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1403 | 1406 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 754 million |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 175 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |