NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 4.8x more pipelines: 96 vs 20
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 519 vs 178
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 88
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 18 April 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 20 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 519 vs 178 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 vs 88 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 7.5 GTexel / s vs 6.7 billion / sec
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 23 Watt
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 916 vs 690
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 916 vs 690
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 7.5 GTexel / s vs 6.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 916 vs 690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 916 vs 690 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 519 | 178 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 88 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 172.058 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.459 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.944 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 690 | 916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 690 | 916 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Curie |
Code name | GF108 | G71 |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 18 April 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1570 | 1567 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | 375 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 215.04 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 6.7 billion / sec | 7.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 278 million |
Boost clock speed | 375 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 500 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |