NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
• Around 77% better floating-point performance: 215.04 gflops vs 121.44 gflops
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 523 vs 217
• 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 43

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M

• Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 9.2 GTexel / s vs 6.7 billion / sec
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5251 vs 1875
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1903 vs 690
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1903 vs 690

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	523 217
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	174 43
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1875 5251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	690 1903
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	690 1903

Compare specifications (specs)