NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M and NVIDIA GeForce 8300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 536 vs 102
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 vs 168
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1524 vs 329
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1524 vs 329
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 January 2011 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 536 vs 102 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 vs 168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1524 vs 329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1524 vs 329 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | NVIDIA GeForce 8300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 536 | 102 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 | 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2012 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.25 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 929 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1210 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1524 | 329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 929 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1210 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1524 | 329 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | NVIDIA GeForce 8300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF106 | C78 |
Launch date | 15 January 2011 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1441 | 1443 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Price now | $22.68 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.26 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 249.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 7.8 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |