NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5400M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 10.56 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 624 vs 536
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 176
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2101 vs 2012
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.068 vs 4.25
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1069 vs 929
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 1210
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 1524
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1069 vs 929
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 1210
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 1524
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 vs 15 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 10.56 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops vs 249.6 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 624 vs 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 vs 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2101 vs 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.068 vs 4.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1069 vs 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1652 vs 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2282 vs 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1069 vs 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1652 vs 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2282 vs 1524 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- Around 97% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 660 MHz
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 660 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 5400M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 624 | 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 | 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2101 | 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.068 | 4.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.562 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.696 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1069 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1652 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2282 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1069 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1652 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2282 | 1524 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 5400M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF108 | GF106 |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 | 15 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1438 | 1440 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 660 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 249.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 10.56 GTexel / s | 7.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
Optimus |