NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5400M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 10.56 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
  • Around 2% better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
  • 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 624 vs 536
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 176
  • Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2101 vs 2012
  • Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.068 vs 4.25
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1069 vs 929
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 1210
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 1524
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1069 vs 929
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 1210
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 1524
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 June 2012 vs 15 January 2011
Texture fill rate 10.56 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
Floating-point performance 253.4 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 624 vs 536
PassMark - G2D Mark 187 vs 176
Geekbench - OpenCL 2101 vs 2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.068 vs 4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1069 vs 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1652 vs 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2282 vs 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1069 vs 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1652 vs 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2282 vs 1524

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

  • Around 97% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 660 MHz
Core clock speed 1300 MHz vs 660 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
624
536
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
187
176
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2101
2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.068
4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1069
929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1652
1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2282
1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1069
929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1652
1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2282
1524
Name NVIDIA NVS 5400M NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark 624 536
PassMark - G2D Mark 187 176
Geekbench - OpenCL 2101 2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.068 4.25
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 229.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1069 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1652 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2282 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1069 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1652 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2282 1524

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA NVS 5400M NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi Fermi
Code name GF108 GF106
Launch date 1 June 2012 15 January 2011
Place in performance rating 1438 1440
Type Mobile workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 660 MHz 1300 MHz
Floating-point performance 253.4 gflops 249.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 96
Texture fill rate 10.56 GTexel / s 7.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 1,170 million
CUDA cores 96

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12 API with Feature Level 12.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus