NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 650 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 135 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 772 vs 555
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 71
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2011 vs 11 December 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 135 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 772 vs 555 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 71 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 41.6 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
- Around 34% better floating-point performance: 416.0 gflops vs 311.04 gflops
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1640 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 3275
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 3275
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 41.6 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 128 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 416.0 gflops vs 311.04 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1640 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 vs 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 vs 3275 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 772 | 555 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 71 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2624 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.139 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.65 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.729 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.871 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF108 | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2011 | 11 December 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $349 |
| Place in performance rating | 1337 | 1339 |
| Price now | $69.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.03 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 650 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 311.04 gflops | 416.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 96 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 13.0 billion / sec | 41.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 135 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 254 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) | 52.5 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) | 1640 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 440 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800 GTS 512
NVIDIAGeForce GT 440 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4830
NVIDIAGeForce GT 440 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIAGeForce GT 440 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7500G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 440 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570D
NVIDIAGeForce GT 440 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 610
