NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX vs ATI Radeon X1650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and ATI Radeon X1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 7.2 billion / sec vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1639 vs 1615
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1639 vs 1615
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 May 2011 vs 1 February 2007 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 billion / sec vs 2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1639 vs 1615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1639 vs 1615 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1650
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX | ATI Radeon X1650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 283 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 53 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1490 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.315 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 122.375 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.629 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.403 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 692 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1583 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1639 | 1615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 692 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1583 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1639 | 1615 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX | ATI Radeon X1650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | R500 |
Code name | GF119 | RV530 |
Launch date | 30 May 2011 | 1 February 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1572 | 1569 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 172.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 billion / sec | 2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
Transistor count | 292 million | 157 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |