NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M

• Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 91
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.099 vs 4.85

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 600 MHz
• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 10.8 billion / sec vs 9.6 billion / sec
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 258.05 gflops vs 230.4 gflops
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 478 vs 456
• Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2171 vs 1837
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 vs 131.334
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.561 vs 0.355
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.109 vs 6.733
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.727 vs 8.015
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 960 vs 911
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 vs 1338
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2701 vs 2623
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 960 vs 911
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 vs 1338
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2701 vs 2623

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	456 478
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	94 91
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1837 2171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.099 4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	131.334 195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.355 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.733 9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.015 16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	911 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1338 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2623 2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	911 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1338 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2623 2701

Compare specifications (specs)