NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M

  • Environ 52% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 35 Watt
  • Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 versus 91
  • Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.099 versus 4.85
Caractéristiques
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 23 Watt versus 35 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark 94 versus 91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.099 versus 4.85

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

  • Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 672 MHz versus 600 MHz
  • Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 10.8 billion / sec versus 9.6 billion / sec
  • Environ 12% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 258.05 gflops versus 230.4 gflops
  • Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 478 versus 456
  • Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2171 versus 1837
  • Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 versus 131.334
  • Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.561 versus 0.355
  • Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.109 versus 6.733
  • 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.727 versus 8.015
  • Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 960 versus 911
  • Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 versus 1338
  • Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2701 versus 2623
  • Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 960 versus 911
  • Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 versus 1338
  • Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2701 versus 2623
Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau 672 MHz versus 600 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture 10.8 billion / sec versus 9.6 billion / sec
Performance á point flottant 258.05 gflops versus 230.4 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark 478 versus 456
Geekbench - OpenCL 2171 versus 1837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 195.796 versus 131.334
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.561 versus 0.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 9.109 versus 6.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 16.727 versus 8.015
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 960 versus 911
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2210 versus 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2701 versus 2623
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 960 versus 911
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2210 versus 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2701 versus 2623

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
456
478
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
94
91
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1837
2171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.099
4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
131.334
195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.355
0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.733
9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.015
16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
911
960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1338
2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2623
2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
911
960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1338
2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2623
2701
Nom NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
PassMark - G3D Mark 456 478
PassMark - G2D Mark 94 91
Geekbench - OpenCL 1837 2171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.099 4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 131.334 195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.355 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 6.733 9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 8.015 16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 911 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1338 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2623 2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 911 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1338 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2623 2701
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Comparer les caractéristiques

NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Essentiel

Architecture Fermi Fermi
Nom de code GF108 GF108
Date de sortie 5 January 2011 5 January 2011
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 1546 1503
Genre Laptop Laptop

Infos techniques

Vitesse du noyau 600 MHz 672 MHz
Noyaux CUDA 96 96
Performance á point flottant 230.4 gflops 258.05 gflops
Processus de fabrication 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 96
Taux de remplissage de la texture 9.6 billion / sec 10.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 23 Watt 35 Watt
Compte de transistor 585 million 585 million

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Connecteurs d’écran No outputs No outputs

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Taille du laptop medium sized large

Soutien API

DirectX 12 API 12 API
OpenCL 1.1 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Mémoire

RAM maximale 1 GB 1 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire 28.8 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire 128 Bit 128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire 900 MHz 900 MHz
Genre de mémoire DDR3 DDR3
Mémoire partagé 0 0

Technologies

CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
DirectCompute