NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
- Environ 52% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 versus 91
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.099 versus 4.85
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 versus 91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.099 versus 4.85 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 672 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 10.8 billion / sec versus 9.6 billion / sec
- Environ 12% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 258.05 gflops versus 230.4 gflops
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 478 versus 456
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2171 versus 1837
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 versus 131.334
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.561 versus 0.355
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.109 versus 6.733
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.727 versus 8.015
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 960 versus 911
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 versus 1338
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2701 versus 2623
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 960 versus 911
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 versus 1338
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2701 versus 2623
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.8 billion / sec versus 9.6 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 258.05 gflops versus 230.4 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 478 versus 456 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2171 versus 1837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.796 versus 131.334 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.561 versus 0.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.109 versus 6.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.727 versus 8.015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 960 versus 911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2210 versus 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2701 versus 2623 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 960 versus 911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2210 versus 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2701 versus 2623 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 456 | 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 | 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1837 | 2171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.099 | 4.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 131.334 | 195.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.355 | 0.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.733 | 9.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.015 | 16.727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 911 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2623 | 2701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 911 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2623 | 2701 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 5 January 2011 | 5 January 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1546 | 1503 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | 672 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 230.4 gflops | 258.05 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 9.6 billion / sec | 10.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | 900 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
DirectCompute |