NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M and NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 5.8x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 103 MHz
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 9.6 billion / sec vs 6.88 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 96 vs 32
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 230.4 gflops vs 68.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 458 vs 131
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 93 vs 58
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2623 vs 1798
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2623 vs 1798
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 3 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 103 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 9.6 billion / sec vs 6.88 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops vs 68.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 458 vs 131 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 93 vs 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2623 vs 1798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2623 vs 1798 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 23 Watt
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 458 | 131 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 93 | 58 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1864 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.099 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 131.334 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.355 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.015 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2623 | 1798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2623 | 1798 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF108 | G96 |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 3 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1542 | 1543 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 103 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops | 68.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 9.6 billion / sec | 6.88 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |