NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 49 Watt
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.85 versus 3.396
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 versus 87.094
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.561 versus 0.243
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.109 versus 5.005
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.727 versus 3.764
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 versus 1713
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2701 versus 1624
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 versus 1713
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2701 versus 1624
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 January 2011 versus 11 October 2010 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 49 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.85 versus 3.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.796 versus 87.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.561 versus 0.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.109 versus 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.727 versus 3.764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2210 versus 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2701 versus 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2210 versus 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2701 versus 1624 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 672 MHz
- Environ 4% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 11.2 billion / sec versus 10.8 billion / sec
- Environ 4% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 268.8 gflops versus 258.05 gflops
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 602 versus 478
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 202 versus 90
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2228 versus 2154
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 versus 960
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 versus 960
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 672 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.2 billion / sec versus 10.8 billion / sec |
| Performance á point flottant | 268.8 gflops versus 258.05 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 602 versus 478 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 202 versus 90 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2228 versus 2154 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 versus 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 versus 960 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 478 | 602 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 90 | 202 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2154 | 2228 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.85 | 3.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.796 | 87.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.561 | 0.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.109 | 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.727 | 3.764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 960 | 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2210 | 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2701 | 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 960 | 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2210 | 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2701 | 1624 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 5 January 2011 | 11 October 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1500 | 1501 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Prix maintenant | $35.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 258.05 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.8 billion / sec | 11.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 49 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
| Noyaux CUDA par GPU | 96 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8400M G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 420
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 3000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7480D
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M vs
AppleA12Z Bionic
