NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 32% higher core clock speed: 740 MHz vs 561 MHz
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 96 vs 72
  • Around 75% better floating-point performance: 284.16 gflops vs 162 gflops
  • Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 568 vs 467
  • Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 116 vs 70
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1790 vs 926
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1790 vs 926
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 January 2011 vs 15 June 2009
Core clock speed 740 MHz vs 561 MHz
Pipelines 96 vs 72
Floating-point performance 284.16 gflops vs 162 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 568 vs 467
PassMark - G2D Mark 116 vs 70
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1790 vs 926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1790 vs 926

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

  • Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 13.46 GTexel / s vs 11.8 billion / sec
  • 2.4x more memory clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7043 vs 2351
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1450 vs 1352
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1450 vs 1352
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 13.46 GTexel / s vs 11.8 billion / sec
Memory clock speed 2200 MHz vs 900 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 7043 vs 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1450 vs 1352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1450 vs 1352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
568
467
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
116
70
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2351
7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1790
926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1352
1450
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1790
926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1352
1450
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
PassMark - G3D Mark 568 467
PassMark - G2D Mark 116 70
Geekbench - OpenCL 2351 7043
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 213.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.978
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1056
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1790 926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1352 1450
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1056
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1790 926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1352 1450

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi Tesla 2.0
Code name GF108 GT215
Launch date 5 January 2011 15 June 2009
Place in performance rating 1508 1510
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 740 MHz 561 MHz
CUDA cores 96
Floating-point performance 284.16 gflops 162 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 72
Texture fill rate 11.8 billion / sec 13.46 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 727 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size large medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 API 10.1
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 35.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz 2200 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus