NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 32% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 740 MHz versus 561 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 96 versus 72
- Environ 75% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 284.16 gflops versus 162 gflops
- Environ 29% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 568 versus 467
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 116 versus 70
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1790 versus 926
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1790 versus 926
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 January 2011 versus 15 June 2009 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 740 MHz versus 561 MHz |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 72 |
| Performance á point flottant | 284.16 gflops versus 162 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 568 versus 467 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 116 versus 70 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1790 versus 926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1790 versus 926 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 13.46 GTexel / s versus 11.8 billion / sec
- 2.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2200 MHz versus 900 MHz
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7043 versus 2351
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1450 versus 1352
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1450 versus 1352
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13.46 GTexel / s versus 11.8 billion / sec |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2200 MHz versus 900 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7043 versus 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1450 versus 1352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1450 versus 1352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 568 | 467 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 116 | 70 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2351 | 7043 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.651 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 213.211 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.624 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.521 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.978 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1056 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1790 | 926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1352 | 1450 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1056 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1790 | 926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1352 | 1450 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GT215 |
| Date de sortie | 5 January 2011 | 15 June 2009 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1508 | 1510 |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 740 MHz | 561 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 284.16 gflops | 162 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 72 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.8 billion / sec | 13.46 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 727 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 35.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1800M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 320M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M vs
IntelHD Graphics 4000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
