NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 6.5 billion / sec vs 3.6 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 5.4x better floating-point performance: 155.5 gflops vs 28.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1024 MB vs 512 MB
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 317 vs 67
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 129 vs 56
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1155 vs 892
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1155 vs 892
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 9 May 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec vs 3.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops vs 28.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1024 MB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 317 vs 67 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 vs 56 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 vs 892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 vs 892 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 29 Watt
- 1200x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 29 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 317 | 67 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 | 56 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 | 892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 | 892 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GF119 | G86 |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 9 May 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1621 | 1623 |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 450 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | 28.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
| Pipelines | 48 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec | 3.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 14 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1024 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 / GDDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8600 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8400M GT
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7340
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8250
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330 IGP
