NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 5450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 6.48 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% better floating-point performance: 155.5 gflops vs 104 gflops
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1796 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 637 vs 344
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 637 vs 344
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1148 vs 666
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1148 vs 666
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 4 February 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops vs 104 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 637 vs 344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 637 vs 344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1148 vs 666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1148 vs 666 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5450
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 80 vs 48
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1457 vs 1364
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1457 vs 1364
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 80 vs 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1457 vs 1364 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1457 vs 1364 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5450
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5450 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.756 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 637 | 344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 637 | 344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1148 | 666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1148 | 666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1364 | 1457 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1364 | 1457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | 0.16 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 136 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.124 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF119 | Cedar |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 4 February 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1595 | 1598 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | 104 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 292 million |
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 170 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.37 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM vs
ATIRadeon HD 5450
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM vs
IntelHD Graphics 3000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 8180
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics
