NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 459 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 3.6 billion / sec
- 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
- 9.2x better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 383 vs 156
- 6.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 158 vs 24
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1162 vs 224
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1683 vs 445
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1162 vs 224
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1683 vs 445
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 17 April 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 459 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec vs 3.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 383 vs 156 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 vs 24 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 vs 224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 vs 445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 vs 224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 vs 445 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 49 Watt
- 800x more memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1791 vs 1571
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 49 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1791 vs 1571 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 383 | 156 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 24 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 | 1791 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.371 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | 224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 | 445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | 224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 | 445 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF108 | G86 |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 17 April 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | $29.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 1554 | 1695 |
| Price now | $39.99 | $39.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.32 | 3.68 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 459 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 96 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec | 3.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 170 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 410M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6410D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280E
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics
