NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 158 vs 56
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 21 July 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 vs 56 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 11.2 billion / sec
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 112 vs 96
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
- 900x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 454 vs 383
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2845 vs 1162
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3304 vs 1683
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2845 vs 1162
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3304 vs 1683
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 11.2 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 112 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 vs 383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2845 vs 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3304 vs 1683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 vs 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3304 vs 1683 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 383 | 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 56 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.371 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 | 3304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF108 | G92 |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 21 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | $160 |
| Place in performance rating | 1554 | 1063 |
| Price now | $39.99 | $103.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.32 | 8.86 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 96 | 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | 105 °C |
| Pipelines | 96 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S / PDIF |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 9" (22.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 410M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6410D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280E
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics
