NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M vs Intel HD Graphics 3000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and Intel HD Graphics 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 8x more pipelines: 96 vs 12
- 12.4x better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 20.4 gflops
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 432 vs 261
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 126 vs 35
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1595 vs 1137
- 23.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 101
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1595 vs 1137
- 23.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 101
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 August 2012 vs 1 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 96 vs 12 |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops vs 20.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 432 vs 261 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 126 vs 35 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 vs 1137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 vs 101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 vs 1137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 vs 101 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 3000
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 715 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 715 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 3000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 432 | 261 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 126 | 35 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.233 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.151 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 | 1137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 | 1137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 101 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Generation 6.0 |
Code name | GF108 | Sandy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 23 August 2012 | 1 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1500 | 1604 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 715 MHz | 1100 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 20.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 12 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 995 million |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 1.7 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |