NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M versus Intel HD Graphics 3000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and Intel HD Graphics 3000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 8x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 12
- 12.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 20.4 gflops
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 432 versus 261
- 3.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 126 versus 35
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1595 versus 1137
- 23.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 versus 101
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1595 versus 1137
- 23.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 101
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 August 2012 versus 1 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 12 |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops versus 20.4 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 432 versus 261 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 126 versus 35 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 versus 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 versus 101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 versus 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 versus 101 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 3000
- Environ 54% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 715 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 32 nm versus 40 nm
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 715 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 32 nm versus 40 nm |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 3000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 432 | 261 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 126 | 35 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.233 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.151 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 | 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 | 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 101 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Generation 6.0 |
| Nom de code | GF108 | Sandy Bridge GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 23 August 2012 | 1 February 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1500 | 1604 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 715 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 20.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 12 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 995 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 1.7 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
ATIRadeon IGP 345M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 3000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
IntelHD Graphics 4000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7480D
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
