NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M versus NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and NVIDIA Quadro 3000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 4.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 versus 218
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1595 versus 374
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 versus 543
- 4.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 versus 218
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1595 versus 374
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 543
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 August 2012 versus 22 February 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 versus 218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 versus 374 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 versus 543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 versus 218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 versus 374 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 versus 543 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 240 versus 96
- Environ 70% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 432.0 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 39% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2500 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 998 versus 432
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 versus 126
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3773 versus 2141
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.95 versus 4.233
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 325.007 versus 161.144
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.865 versus 0.519
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.794 versus 7.151
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.961 versus 16.605
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 240 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 432.0 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 998 versus 432 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 versus 126 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3773 versus 2141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.95 versus 4.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 325.007 versus 161.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.865 versus 0.519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.794 versus 7.151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.961 versus 16.605 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | NVIDIA Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 432 | 998 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 126 | 315 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2141 | 3773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.233 | 10.95 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 | 325.007 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 | 0.865 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.151 | 13.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 | 27.961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 | 218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 | 374 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 | 218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 | 374 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 543 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | NVIDIA Quadro 3000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GF104 |
| Date de sortie | 23 August 2012 | 22 February 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1500 | 1502 |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $398.96 | |
| Prix maintenant | $199.95 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.98 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 715 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 240 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,950 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 450 MHz | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
ATIRadeon IGP 345M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 3000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
IntelHD Graphics 4000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7480D
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
