NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3257 versus 1913
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3257 versus 1913
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2012 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3257 versus 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3257 versus 1913 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 652.8 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1207 versus 479
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 versus 141
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3844 versus 2229
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 versus 999
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 versus 999
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3299 versus 2333
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3299 versus 2333
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 652.8 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1207 versus 479 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 versus 141 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3844 versus 2229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 versus 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 versus 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3299 versus 2333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3299 versus 2333 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 479 | 1207 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 141 | 235 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2229 | 3844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 999 | 2283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 999 | 2283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2333 | 3299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2333 | 3299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3257 | 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3257 | 1913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.824 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.111 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 414 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GF117 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1208 | 1210 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 240.0 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,270 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
AMDFirePro W2100
