NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 and AMD Radeon HD 7570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 62% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 679 vs 428
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 214 vs 190
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2393 vs 1096
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 vs 3.109
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.502 vs 0.333
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 vs 905
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 1797
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 vs 905
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 1797

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570M

• 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
• Around 54% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 311.0 gflops
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 199.164 vs 140.06
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.489 vs 9.613
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.722 vs 12.49
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2352 vs 2073
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2352 vs 2073

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	679 428
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	214 190
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 1096
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.498 3.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.06 199.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.502 0.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.613 10.489
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.49 42.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1151 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1853 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2073 2352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1151 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1853 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2073 2352

Compare specifications (specs)