NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 and NVIDIA Quadro 1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 700 MHz
• Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
• Around 16% better floating-point performance: 311.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 676 vs 567
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 195
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2448 vs 2123
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 vs 5.218
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 vs 894
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 1633
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 vs 894
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 1633

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 207.789 vs 140.06
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.52 vs 0.502
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.149 vs 9.613
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.677 vs 12.49
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2327 vs 2073
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2327 vs 2073

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	676 567
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	217 195
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2448 2123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.498 5.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.06 207.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.502 0.52
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.613 10.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.49 23.677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1151 894
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1853 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2073 2327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1151 894
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1853 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2073 2327

Compare specifications (specs)