NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 672 MHz
• Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 10.8 billion / sec
• Around 21% better floating-point performance: 311.0 gflops vs 258.05 gflops
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 681 vs 478
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 91
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2473 vs 2171
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 vs 4.85
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.613 vs 9.109
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 vs 960
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 vs 960

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

• Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 vs 140.06
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.561 vs 0.502
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.727 vs 12.49
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 vs 1853
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2701 vs 2073
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 vs 1853
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2701 vs 2073

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	681 478
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	225 91
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2473 2171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.498 4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.06 195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.502 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.613 9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.49 16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1151 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1853 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2073 2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1151 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1853 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2073 2701

Compare specifications (specs)