NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 106 Watt
Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 13 September 2010 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 106 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Around 93% higher core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 94% higher texture fill rate: 25.1 billion / sec vs 12.96 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 93% better floating-point performance: 601.3 gflops vs 311.0 gflops
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1323 vs 678
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 216
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5036 vs 2440
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.758 vs 6.498
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 302.509 vs 140.06
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.965 vs 0.502
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.925 vs 9.613
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.656 vs 12.49
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 vs 1151
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 1853
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2073
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 vs 1151
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 1853
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2073
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec vs 12.96 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops vs 311.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1323 vs 678 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 vs 216 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5036 vs 2440 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 vs 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 vs 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.965 vs 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 vs 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.656 vs 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 vs 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 vs 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 vs 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 vs 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 2073 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 678 | 1323 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | 304 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2440 | 5036 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF108 | GF106 |
Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 13 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 1446 | 1144 |
Price now | $99.21 | $64.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.89 | 26.46 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1566 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 311.0 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 106 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |