NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 63% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 106 Watt
| Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 versus 13 September 2010 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 106 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Environ 93% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1566 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 94% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.1 billion / sec versus 12.96 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 96
- Environ 93% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 601.3 gflops versus 311.0 gflops
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1323 versus 678
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 versus 216
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5036 versus 2440
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.758 versus 6.498
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 302.509 versus 140.06
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.965 versus 0.502
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.925 versus 9.613
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.656 versus 12.49
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 versus 1151
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 versus 1853
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 versus 2073
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 versus 1151
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 versus 1853
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 versus 2073
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1566 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.1 billion / sec versus 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 601.3 gflops versus 311.0 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1323 versus 678 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 versus 216 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5036 versus 2440 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 versus 6.498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 versus 140.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.965 versus 0.502 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 versus 9.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.656 versus 12.49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 versus 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 versus 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 versus 2073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 versus 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 versus 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 versus 2073 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 678 | 1323 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | 304 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2440 | 5036 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 | 14.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 | 302.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | 0.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | 14.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 | 27.656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GF106 |
| Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 | 13 September 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99.99 | $129 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1446 | 1144 |
| Prix maintenant | $99.21 | $64.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.89 | 26.46 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 1566 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 311.0 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.96 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 106 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,170 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 1000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7650A
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7570M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
NVIDIANVS 5400M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400E
