NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 versus NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 and NVIDIA Quadro 1000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 16% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 12.96 GTexel / s versus 11.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 16% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 311.0 gflops versus 268.8 gflops
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 676 versus 567
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 versus 195
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2448 versus 2123
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 versus 5.218
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 versus 894
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 versus 1633
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 versus 894
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 versus 1633
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 versus 13 January 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.96 GTexel / s versus 11.2 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 311.0 gflops versus 268.8 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 676 versus 567 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 versus 195 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2448 versus 2123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 versus 5.218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 versus 894 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 versus 1633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 versus 894 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 versus 1633 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
- Environ 44% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 65 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 207.789 versus 140.06
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.52 versus 0.502
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.149 versus 9.613
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.677 versus 12.49
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2327 versus 2073
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2327 versus 2073
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 207.789 versus 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.52 versus 0.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.149 versus 9.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.677 versus 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2327 versus 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2327 versus 2073 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | NVIDIA Quadro 1000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 676 | 567 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 195 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2448 | 2123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 | 5.218 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 | 207.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | 0.52 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | 10.149 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 | 23.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 | 894 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 | 1633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 | 2327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 | 894 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 | 1633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 | 2327 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | NVIDIA Quadro 1000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 | 13 January 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99.99 | $174.95 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1445 | 1448 |
Prix maintenant | $99.21 | $99.95 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.89 | 8.91 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 700 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 311.0 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.96 GTexel / s | 11.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |