NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- Environ 23% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 384.0 gflops versus 311.04 gflops
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 96% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3140 MHz versus 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.495 versus 6.139
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 251.012 versus 171.053
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.333 versus 9.729
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1583 versus 1208
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2289 versus 2053
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1583 versus 1208
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2289 versus 2053
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 May 2012 versus 1 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 384.0 gflops versus 311.04 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3140 MHz versus 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.495 versus 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.012 versus 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.333 versus 9.729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 versus 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 versus 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 versus 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 versus 2053 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 774 versus 704
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 237 versus 171
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2626 versus 2344
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.871 versus 13.954
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3275 versus 3127
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3275 versus 3127
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 774 versus 704 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 versus 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2626 versus 2344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.65 versus 0.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.871 versus 13.954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 versus 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 versus 3127 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 704 | 774 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 237 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2344 | 2626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.495 | 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.012 | 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.649 | 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.333 | 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.954 | 19.871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3127 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3127 | 3275 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 4 May 2012 | 1 February 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $849.99 | $79 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1340 | 1342 |
Prix maintenant | $849.99 | $69.99 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.17 | 14.03 |
Infos techniques |
||
Noyaux CUDA | Up to 384 | 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 384.0 gflops | 311.04 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz | |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13.0 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3140 MHz | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3\DDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) | |
Mémoire config standard par GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |