NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M und NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 6 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 41% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 32 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 vs 3299
- Etwa 75% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 1913
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 vs 3299
- Etwa 75% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 1913
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 October 2012 vs 22 March 2012 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Maximale Speichergröße | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 vs 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 vs 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 1913 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- Etwa 20% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 652.8 gflops vs 544.5 gflops
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1202 vs 932
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 236 vs 161
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3788 vs 2659
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.947 vs 8.493
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.824 vs 285.42
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.982 vs 0.863
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.773 vs 17.242
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.111 vs 19.116
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 vs 1913
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 vs 1913
Spezifikationen | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 652.8 gflops vs 544.5 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1202 vs 932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 vs 161 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3788 vs 2659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 vs 8.493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.824 vs 285.42 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 vs 0.863 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.773 vs 17.242 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.111 vs 19.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 vs 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 vs 1913 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 932 | 1202 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 161 | 236 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2659 | 3788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.493 | 9.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.42 | 340.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.863 | 0.982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.242 | 18.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.116 | 23.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 | 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 | 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 1913 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 414 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Kepler | Kepler |
Codename | GK107 | GK107 |
Startdatum | 1 October 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1214 | 1215 |
Typ | Laptop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
CUDA-Kerne | 384 | 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 544.5 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 384 |
Texturfüllrate | 22.7 billion / sec | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 32 Watt | 45 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 950 MHz | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | medium sized |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128bit | 128bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Speichertyp | DDR3\GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
Optimus |