NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 3.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 112
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 652.8 gflops vs 308 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1202 vs 381
• 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 239 vs 41

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3085 vs 1913
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3085 vs 1913

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1202 381
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	239 41
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 3085
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 3085

Compare specifications (specs)