NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 384 vs 240
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 204 Watt
- Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1242 MHz
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 239 vs 68
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 23 December 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 240 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 204 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1242 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 vs 68 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 708.5 gflops vs 652.8 gflops
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1501 vs 1205
- 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22124 vs 3805
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 1913
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 1913
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Floating-point performance | 708.5 gflops vs 652.8 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1501 vs 1205 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22124 vs 3805 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 1913 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1205 | 1501 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 | 68 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3805 | 22124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.824 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.111 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3299 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1913 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3299 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1913 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GT200B |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 23 December 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1204 | 1206 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $359 | |
| Price now | $179.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 384 | 240 |
| Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 708.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
| Core clock speed | 1476 MHz | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 51.8 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 159.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3410
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 285
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
IntelIris Graphics 5100
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX
